Documentation Guidelines for Asperger's Syndrome
This includes students who have been diagnosed with Autism or Asperger's Syndrome under the DSM IV criteria by an appropriate diagnostician.
Qualifications of the Evaluator
Professionals conducting assessments rendering diagnoses of an autism spectrum disorder and making recommendations for accommodations must be qualified to do so. Comprehensive training and relevant experience in differential diagnosis and the full range of psychiatric disorders are essential. The name, title and professional credentials of the evaluator, including information about license or certification as well as the area of specialization, employment and state or province in which the individual practices should be clearly stated in the documentation. The following professionals would generally be considered qualified to evaluate and diagnose autism spectrum disorders provided they have comprehensive training in the differential diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders and direct experience with an adolescent or adult autism population: clinical psychologists, neuropsychologists, psychiatrists, and other relevantly trained medical doctors.
Use of diagnostic terminology indicating an autism spectrum disorder by someone whose training and experience are not in these fields is not acceptable. It is also not appropriate for professionals to evaluate members of their own families. All reports should be on letterhead, typed, dated, signed and otherwise legible.
Documentation Should be Current
Because the provision of all reasonable accommodations and services is based upon assessment of the current impact of the disability on current academic performance, it is in an individual's best interest to provide recent and appropriate documentation. Student Disability Services requires that documentation be no more than 3 years old.
Although prior documentation is useful in determining appropriate services in the past, current documentation must validate the need for services based on the individual's present level of functioning in the educational setting. A school plan such as an IEP (individualized educational plan) or a 504 plan is insufficient documentation in and of itself but can be included as part of a more comprehensive evaluative report. However, a prior history of accommodations without demonstration of a current need does not in itself warrant the provision of like accommodations. If no prior accommodations were provided, the qualified professional and/ or the candidate must include a detailed explanation of why no accommodations were needed in the past and why accommodations are needed at this time.
Documentation should be comprehensive and must include the following:
Relevant historical information is essential since autism spectrum disorders are by definition, first exhibited in childhood and manifests itself in more than one setting.
In addition to providing evidence of childhood history of impairment, please also include evidence of ongoing symptoms that significantly impair functioning in two or more settings. Please also include diagnostic interviews including self-reports and third party sources.
The evaluator must investigate and discuss the possibility of dual diagnoses and alternative or coexisting mood, behavioral, neurological and/ or personality disorders that may confound the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders.
The report must include a specific diagnosis of an autism spectrum disorder based on the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria. The diagnostician should use direct language in the diagnosis and avoid using terms such as "suggests" or "is indicative of".
Neuropsychological or psycho-educational assessment is important in determining the current impact of the disorder on the individual's ability to function in academically-related settings. The evaluator should objectively review and include within the evaluation report relevant background information to support the diagnosis. If grade equivalents are reported, they must be accompanied by standard scores and/or percentiles. Test scores or subtest scores alone should not be used as a sole measure for the diagnostic decision regarding autism spectrum disorders. Selected subtest performance tests do not in and of themselves establish the presence or absence of autism spectrum disorders . Checklists and/ or surveys can serve to supplement the diagnostic profile but in and of themselves are not adequate for the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder and do not substitute for clinical observations and sound diagnostic judgment. All data must logically reflect a substantial limitation to learning for which the individual is requesting the accommodation.
Each Accommodation Recommended by the Evaluator Should Include a Rationale
The evaluator must describe the impact, if any, of the diagnosed autism spectrum disorder on a specific major life activity as well as the degree of impact on the individual. The diagnostic report may include specific recommendations for accommodations at postsecondary institutions. A detailed explanation as to why each accommodation is recommended must be provided and should be correlated with specific functional limitations determined through interview, observation, and and/ or testing.
A reasonable accommodation within the evaluator's report may or may not constitute a reasonable accommodation at the University of San Francisco .